Services on Demand
Don't have an account? This chapter emphasizes the crucial difference between ideology and simple factual error or confusion as to one's own interests or the ethical implications of one's acts. It argues that deconstruction, whether or not it is linked with Marxism, is a theory mired in implausible metaphysical presuppositions and developed in frequently dubious and often straightforwardly invalid arguments, in many cases combined with an intimidating rhetoric.
It does not seem in any way a suitable replacement for or even a worthwhile adjunct to ideological critique in the simple sense of an enquiry into validity, morality, and function. Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service.
The Cloture of Deconstruction: A Mahayana Critique of Derrida
Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter. Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us. All Rights Reserved. OSO version 0.
University Press Scholarship Online. Sign in. Not registered? Examples include nature and culture , speech and writing, mind and body, presence and absence, inside and outside, literal and metaphorical, intelligible and sensible, and form and meaning , among many others. For Rousseau, then, nature is prior to culture.
For Derrida, the most telling and pervasive opposition is the one that treats writing as secondary to or derivative of speech. As Derrida argues, however, spoken words function as linguistic signs only to the extent that they can be repeated in different contexts , in the absence of the speaker who originally utters them.
One indication of this fact, according to Derrida, is that descriptions of speech in Western philosophy often rely on examples and metaphors related to writing. In effect, these texts describe speech as a form of writing, even in cases where writing is explicitly claimed to be secondary to speech. Rather, it is to displace the opposition so as to show that neither term is primary.
Critical Thinking and the Question of Critique: Some Lessons from Deconstruction
Hence, meanings can be adequately understood only with reference to the specific contrasts and differences they display with other, related meanings. Logocentrism encourages us to treat linguistic signs as distinct from and inessential to the phenomena they represent, rather than as inextricably bound up with them.
Article Media. Info Print Print. Table Of Contents. Submit Feedback.
- Playfellow (Darkover).
- Deconstruction: A Critique;
- Encyclopedia of Russian History (Volumes I-IV);
- Land, Land.
- Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity;
Related Deconstruction: A Critique
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved